AMD Opteron 3365 vs AMD FX-6300

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 3365 and AMD FX-6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 3365

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
• 2 more threads: 8 vs 6
• Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
• 3.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2048 vs 527
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 6931 vs 1914

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6300

• Around 15% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
• Around 0% higher maximum core temperature: 70.50°C vs 70.30°C
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1486 vs 1133
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4220 vs 4083

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron 3365
CPU 2: AMD FX-6300

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1133 1486
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	4083 4220
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2048 527
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	6931 1914

Compare specifications (specs)