AMD Opteron X2 265 vs Intel Core Duo T2050
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron X2 265 and Intel Core Duo T2050 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Memory, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 265
- Around 13% higher clock speed: 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
| Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Duo T2050
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron X2 265
CPU 2: Intel Core Duo T2050
| Name | AMD Opteron X2 265 | Intel Core Duo T2050 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 498 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 333 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Opteron X2 265 | Intel Core Duo T2050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Italy | Yonah |
| Launch date | May 2005 | May 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 3024 |
| Vertical segment | Server | Mobile |
| Processor Number | T2050 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 2048 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 233 million | 151 million |
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 533 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 533 MHz | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
| VID voltage range | 0.7625-1.3V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 940 | PPGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 31 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||