AMD Opteron X3216 vs Intel Core i5-8400
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron X3216 and Intel Core i5-8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Virtualization, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X3216
- Around 74900% higher clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 4.00 GHz
| Maximum frequency | 3000 MHz vs 4.00 GHz |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-8400
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
- 4 more threads: 6 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 32 GB
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1826 vs 736
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1826 vs 736
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3900 vs 875
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3900 vs 875
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6201 vs 2315
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6201 vs 2315
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 6 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB vs 32 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1826 vs 736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1826 vs 736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3900 vs 875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3900 vs 875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6201 vs 2315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6201 vs 2315 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron X3216
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-8400
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Opteron X3216 | Intel Core i5-8400 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 736 | 1826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 736 | 1826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 875 | 3900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 875 | 3900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2315 | 6201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2315 | 6201 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2373 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 9223 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1048 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4580 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.68 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 73.097 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.752 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.767 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.333 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Opteron X3216 | Intel Core i5-8400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Toronto | Coffee Lake |
| Launch date | Q2'17 | 5 January 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 2060 | 1149 |
| Vertical segment | Server | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $190 | |
| Price now | $259 | |
| Processor Number | i5-8400 | |
| Series | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.28 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1600 MHz | 2.80 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3000 MHz | 4.00 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 6 |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| L3 cache | 9 MB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1600 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 800 MHz | 350 MHz |
| iGPU core count | 4 | |
| Processor graphics | Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x3E92 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Opteron X3216 with others
AMDOpteron X3216 vs
IntelXeon L5530
AMDOpteron X3216 vs
AMDOpteron 6274
AMDOpteron X3216 vs
AMDOpteron 3380
AMDOpteron X3216 vs
AMDOpteron 4274 HE
AMDOpteron X3216 vs
IntelXeon D-1559
AMDOpteron X3216 vs
IntelXeon E3-1241 v3
