AMD PRO A10-8750B vs AMD A12-9800

Comparative analysis of AMD PRO A10-8750B and AMD A12-9800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A10-8750B

  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
L2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB

Reasons to consider the AMD A12-9800

  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • Around 5% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz
  • Around 26% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs 71.30°C
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1674 vs 1320
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3611 vs 2935
  • Around 27% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 552 vs 433
  • Around 35% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1679 vs 1242
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2365 vs 1790
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8307 vs 6033
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2365 vs 1790
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8307 vs 6033
Specifications (specs)
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Maximum frequency 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz
Maximum core temperature 90°C vs 71.30°C
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1674 vs 1320
PassMark - CPU mark 3611 vs 2935
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 552 vs 433
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1679 vs 1242
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2365 vs 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8307 vs 6033
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2365 vs 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8307 vs 6033

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD PRO A10-8750B
CPU 2: AMD A12-9800

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1320
1674
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
2935
3611
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
433
552
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1242
1679
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1790
2365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
6033
8307
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1790
2365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
6033
8307
Name AMD PRO A10-8750B AMD A12-9800
PassMark - Single thread mark 1320 1674
PassMark - CPU mark 2935 3611
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 433 552
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1242 1679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 17.07
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 221.069
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 88.743
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1790 2365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6033 8307
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1790 2365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6033 8307
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 0
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2290

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD PRO A10-8750B AMD A12-9800

Essentials

Family AMD PRO A-Series Processors AMD A-Series Processors
OPN Tray AD875BYBI44JC AD9800AUM44AB
OS Support Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Place in performance rating 1017 1020
Series AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops AMD A12-Series APU for Desktops
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Architecture codename Bristol Ridge
Launch date 27 July 2017
Launch price (MSRP) $139
OPN PIB AD9800AUABBOX
Price now $129.99
Value for money (0-100) 12.51

Performance

Base frequency 3.6 GHz 3.8 GHz
Compute Cores 12 12
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Maximum core temperature 71.30°C 90°C
Maximum frequency 4 GHz 4.2 GHz
Number of cores 4 4
Number of GPU cores 8 8
Number of threads 4
Unlocked
64 bit support
Die size 246 mm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 74 °C
Transistor count 1178 million

Memory

Max memory channels 2 2
Supported memory frequency 2133 MHz 2400 MHz
Supported memory types DDR4

Graphics

Enduro
Graphics max frequency 757 MHz 1108 MHz
iGPU core count 512 8
Processor graphics AMD Radeon R7 Graphics Radeon R7 Series
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
HDMI

Graphics API support

DirectX 12 DirectX® 12
Vulkan

Compatibility

Configurable TDP 45 Watt/65 Watt
Sockets supported FM2+ AM4
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 65 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1

Advanced Technologies

AMD App Acceleration
AMD Elite Experiences
AMD HD3D technology
AMD Mantle API
DualGraphics
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
FreeSync
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Out-of-band client management
PowerGating
PowerNow
PowerTune
RAID
System Image Stability
TrueAudio
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC)
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
VirusProtect

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2.0

Peripherals

Max number of PCIe lanes 8
PCI Express revision 3.0 x8