AMD PRO A12-9800 vs Intel Celeron N4000
Comparative analysis of AMD PRO A12-9800 and Intel Celeron N4000 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A12-9800
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 62% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 2.60 GHz
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1705 vs 1037
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3755 vs 1428
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1176 vs 583
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1176 vs 583
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 2.60 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1705 vs 1037 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3755 vs 1428 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1176 vs 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1176 vs 583 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N4000
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 90°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 10.8x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1322 vs 477
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1853 vs 1715
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1322 vs 477
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1853 vs 1715
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 3 October 2016 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C vs 90°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1322 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1853 vs 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1322 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1853 vs 1715 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD PRO A12-9800
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N4000
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD PRO A12-9800 | Intel Celeron N4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1705 | 1037 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3755 | 1428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1176 | 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 477 | 1322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1715 | 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1176 | 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 477 | 1322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1715 | 1853 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 388 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 680 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD PRO A12-9800 | Intel Celeron N4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 3 October 2016 | 11 December 2017 |
| OPN Tray | AD980BAUM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 1054 | 2250 |
| Series | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Processor Number | N4000 | |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.8 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 105 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Number of threads | 2 | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 1108 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | R7 | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x3185 | |
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| eDP | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | AM4 | FCBGA1090 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 24mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.8 W | |
| Thermal Solution | 105 deg C | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Integrated Wireless | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC | |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 6 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD PRO A12-9800 with others
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i5-2500T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDA10-7860K
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i3-7101E
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDRyzen 5 3400GE
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i5-10400F
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3350G
