AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) vs AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W)
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) and AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W)
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.576 vs 3.118
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 14.5 vs 6.836
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.212 vs 0.162
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.394 vs 0.298
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.125 vs 3.494
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | April 2009 vs October 2008 |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) vs 2048 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.576 vs 3.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14.5 vs 6.836 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.212 vs 0.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.394 vs 0.298 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.125 vs 3.494 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W)
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W)
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W)
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) | AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.576 | 3.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14.5 | 6.836 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.212 | 0.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.394 | 0.298 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.125 | 3.494 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 318 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1084 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) | AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Deneb | Agena |
Launch date | April 2009 | October 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 3269 | 3265 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 258 mm | 285 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 2048 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Transistor count | 758 million | 450 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM2+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 125 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |