AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) vs AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W)

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) and AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W)

  • CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • Around 15% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
  • 3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.576 vs 3.118
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 14.5 vs 6.836
  • Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.212 vs 0.162
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.394 vs 0.298
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.125 vs 3.494
Specifications (specs)
Launch date April 2009 vs October 2008
Maximum frequency 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 65 nm
L3 cache 6144 KB (shared) vs 2048 KB (shared)
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.576 vs 3.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 14.5 vs 6.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.212 vs 0.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.394 vs 0.298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.125 vs 3.494

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W)

  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W)
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W)

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.576
3.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
14.5
6.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.212
0.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.394
0.298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
4.125
3.494
Name AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W)
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.576 3.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 14.5 6.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.212 0.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.394 0.298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.125 3.494
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 318
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1084

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W)

Essentials

Architecture codename Deneb Agena
Launch date April 2009 October 2008
Place in performance rating 3269 3265
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 258 mm 285 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 512 KB (per core)
L3 cache 6144 KB (shared) 2048 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 65 nm
Maximum frequency 3 GHz 2.6 GHz
Number of cores 4 4
Transistor count 758 million 450 million
Unlocked

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM3 AM2+
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 125 Watt 125 Watt

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)