AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) vs Intel Celeron 220
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) and Intel Celeron 220 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W)
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- Around 150% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 1.2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Launch date | April 2009 vs October 2007 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 1.2 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 220
- 6.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W)
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 220
Name | AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) | Intel Celeron 220 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.576 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14.5 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.212 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.394 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.125 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 255 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 209 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X4 945 (125W) | Intel Celeron 220 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Deneb | Conroe |
Launch date | April 2009 | October 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 3269 | 3267 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | 220 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 258 mm | 77 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
Transistor count | 758 million | 105 million |
Base frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 533 MHz FSB | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 533 MHz | |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
Number of threads | 1 | |
VID voltage range | 1.0000V-1.3375V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | PBGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 19 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |