AMD Phenom X4 9650 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9650 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization, Memory, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9650
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 23% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 1.87 GHz
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 908 vs 691
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1733 vs 638
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 283 vs 251
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 990 vs 446
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | March 2008 vs July 2006 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz vs 1.87 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 908 vs 691 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1733 vs 638 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 283 vs 251 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 990 vs 446 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9650
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom X4 9650 | Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 908 | 691 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1733 | 638 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 283 | 251 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 990 | 446 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.403 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Agena | Conroe |
Launch date | March 2008 | July 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 3038 | 3027 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $12.99 | |
Processor Number | E6300 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.13 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 285 mm | 111 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2048 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz | 1.87 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 450 million | 167 million |
Base frequency | 1.86 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
Maximum core temperature | 61.4°C | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.5V | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2+ | PLGA775, LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring |