AMD Phenom X4 9650 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9650 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization, Memory, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9650
- CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1743 vs 908
- Around 88% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 990 vs 527
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.833 vs 0.261
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | March 2008 vs July 2007 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 910 vs 909 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1743 vs 908 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 990 vs 527 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.833 vs 0.261 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
- Around 1% higher clock speed: 2.33 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 303 vs 283
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 18.666 vs 8.403
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.33 GHz vs 2.3 GHz |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 303 vs 283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.666 vs 8.403 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9650
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom X4 9650 | Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 910 | 909 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1743 | 908 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 283 | 303 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 990 | 527 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.833 | 0.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.403 | 18.666 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.077 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.371 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.88 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Agena | Conroe |
Launch date | March 2008 | July 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 3047 | 3218 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $14.95 | |
Processor Number | E6550 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 29.56 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 285 mm | 143 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 4096 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 450 million | 291 million |
Base frequency | 2.33 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Maximum core temperature | 72°C | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.5V | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2+ | PLGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring |