AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) vs Intel Celeron 220
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) and Intel Celeron 220 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W)
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- Around 100% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Launch date | March 2008 vs October 2007 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 220
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W)
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 220
Name | AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) | Intel Celeron 220 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.726 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.148 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 255 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 209 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) | Intel Celeron 220 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Agena | Conroe |
Launch date | March 2008 | October 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 3278 | 3267 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | 220 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 285 mm | 77 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
Transistor count | 450 million | 105 million |
Base frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 533 MHz FSB | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 533 MHz | |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
Number of threads | 1 | |
VID voltage range | 1.0000V-1.3375V | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2+ | PBGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 19 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring |