AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) vs AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W)
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) and AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W)
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 140 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 9.726 vs 6.836
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.726 vs 6.836 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W)
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.118 vs 2.562
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.162 vs 0.148
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.118 vs 2.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.162 vs 0.148 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W)
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W)
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) | AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W) |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.562 | 3.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.726 | 6.836 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.148 | 0.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.298 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.494 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) | AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (140W) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Agena | Agena |
Launch date | March 2008 | March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 3278 | 3295 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 285 mm | 285 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 2048 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Transistor count | 450 million | 450 million |
Unlocked | ||
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2+ | AM2+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 140 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |