AMD Phenom X4 9850B vs Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9850B and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization, Memory, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9850B
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 130 Watt
| Launch date | August 2008 vs November 2007 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 20% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| L2 cache | 12288 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9850B
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
| Name | AMD Phenom X4 9850B | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 992 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1946 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 465 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1463 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 4864 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Phenom X4 9850B | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Agena | Yorkfield |
| Launch date | August 2008 | November 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 2282 | 2283 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | QX9650 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 285 mm | 214 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 12288 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 450 million | 820 million |
| Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 64 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 64.5°C | |
| Unlocked | ||
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM2+ | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||