AMD Pro A10-8700B vs AMD A4-4300M
Comparative analysis of AMD Pro A10-8700B and AMD A4-4300M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Pro A10-8700B
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1109 vs 1019
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2189 vs 1005
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 325 vs 313
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 883 vs 482
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.722 vs 0.74
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2.877 vs 1.13
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.138 vs 0.035
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.35 vs 5.292
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.422 vs 1.108
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2015 vs 30 June 2012 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1109 vs 1019 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2189 vs 1005 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 vs 313 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 883 vs 482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 vs 0.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.877 vs 1.13 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 vs 0.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.35 vs 5.292 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.422 vs 1.108 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A4-4300M
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3568 vs 1763
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3568 vs 1763
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3568 vs 1763 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3568 vs 1763 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Pro A10-8700B
CPU 2: AMD A4-4300M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Pro A10-8700B | AMD A4-4300M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1109 | 1019 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2189 | 1005 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 | 313 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 883 | 482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 | 0.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.877 | 1.13 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 | 0.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.35 | 5.292 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.422 | 1.108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1763 | 3568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1763 | 3568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 307 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 307 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1699 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Pro A10-8700B | AMD A4-4300M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Carrizo | Trinity |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2015 | 30 June 2012 |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 2342 | 2345 |
| Series | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Laptops | AMD A-Series |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | |
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Transistor count | 3100 Million | 1303 Million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Die size | 246 mm | |
| L1 cache | 96 KB | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 / DDR3L-2133 | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 384 | |
| Number of pipelines | 384 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | FP4 | FS1r2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Pro A10-8700B with others
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDTurion 64 X2 TL-64
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelCore i3-2332M
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelCore i7-3555LE
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDA4-4300M
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
IntelAtom E3827
AMDPro A10-8700B vs
AMDA6-7310
