AMD RX-427BB versus AMD A9-9425
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD RX-427BB et AMD A9-9425 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD RX-427BB
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 97197% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3600 MHz versus 3.7 GHz
- 4x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1702 versus 943
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1809 versus 1243
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5750 versus 3556
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1702 versus 943
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1809 versus 1243
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5750 versus 3556
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3600 MHz versus 3.7 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB versus 1 MB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1702 versus 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 versus 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5750 versus 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1702 versus 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 versus 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5750 versus 3556 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9425
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.781 versus 3.913
- 9.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 112.324 versus 12.202
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.615 versus 0.185
- 24.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.577 versus 0.562
- 11.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.717 versus 3.551
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 versus 3.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.324 versus 12.202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.615 versus 0.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.577 versus 0.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.717 versus 3.551 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD RX-427BB
CPU 2: AMD A9-9425
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD RX-427BB | AMD A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.913 | 7.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12.202 | 112.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 | 0.615 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.562 | 13.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.551 | 40.717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1702 | 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 | 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5750 | 3556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1702 | 943 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 | 1243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5750 | 3556 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1322 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1513 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3077 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD RX-427BB | AMD A9-9425 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Bald Eagle | Stoney Ridge |
| Family | AMD R-Series | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Date de sortie | 20 May 2014 | 2Q18 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1611 | 1562 |
| Processor Number | RX-427BB | |
| Segment vertical | Embedded | Laptop |
| OPN Tray | AM9425AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Série | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2700 MHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Taille de dé | 928 mm2 | 124 mm |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3600 MHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Compte de transistor | 1200 million | |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 1 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3-2133 | DDR4 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 686 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Nombre de pipelines | 512 | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 4 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 30-35 Watt | 10-15 Watt |
| Package Size | micro-BGA | |
| Prise courants soutenu | BGA (FP3) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD RX-427BB avec des autres
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelCore i7-4710MQ
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelCore i7-8809G
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelXeon E5-2648L v4
AMDRX-427BB vs
AMDRX-421BD
AMDRX-427BB vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
AMDRX-427BB vs
AppleA9X
