AMD Ryzen 3 3250U vs AMD FX-6350

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U and AMD FX-6350 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

• CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher maximum core temperature: 95 °C vs 61°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 125 Watt
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1749 vs 1574

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6350

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 6 vs 4
• Around 20% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
• Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4621 vs 3766

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
CPU 2: AMD FX-6350

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1749 1574
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3766 4621

Compare specifications (specs)