AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD FX-8370E
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 1600 and AMD FX-8370E processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4 more threads: 12 vs 8
- Around 34% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 71 °C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2066 vs 1463
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 12278 vs 5306
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.064 vs 9.383
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 42.999 vs 20.879
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.822 vs 0.401
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.717 vs 0.984
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.504 vs 5.33
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 April 2017 vs September 2014 |
Number of threads | 12 vs 8 |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 71 °C |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2066 vs 1463 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 12278 vs 5306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.064 vs 9.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.999 vs 20.879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.822 vs 0.401 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.717 vs 0.984 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.504 vs 5.33 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8370E
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
- 2.7x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2859 vs 900
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 11715 vs 4987
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
Maximum frequency | 4.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
L2 cache | 8192 KB vs 3 MB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2859 vs 900 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 11715 vs 4987 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 1600
CPU 2: AMD FX-8370E
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD FX-8370E |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2066 | 1463 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 12278 | 5306 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 900 | 2859 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4987 | 11715 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3180 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.064 | 9.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.999 | 20.879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.822 | 0.401 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.717 | 0.984 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.504 | 5.33 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD FX-8370E | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zen | Vishera |
Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | |
Launch date | 11 April 2017 | September 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $210 | |
OPN PIB | YD1600BBAEBOX | |
OPN Tray | YD1600BBM6IAE | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Place in performance rating | 1868 | 1878 |
Price now | $129.99 | $223.87 |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.80 | 10.27 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.2 GHz | |
Die size | 192 mm | 315 mm |
L1 cache | 576 KB | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 8192 KB |
L3 cache | 16 MB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 71 °C |
Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 8 |
Number of threads | 12 | 8 |
Transistor count | 4800 Million | 1200 million |
Unlocked | ||
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2667 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3-1866 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM4 | AM3+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Wraith Spire (No LED) | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 3.0 x16 | n / a |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
Extended Frequency Range (XFR) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |