AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and AMD Ryzen 5 2500U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2145 vs 1807
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 8738 vs 6513
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 853 vs 661
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3173 vs 2341
- 9.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.311 vs 4.657
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 375.23 vs 270.96
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.018 vs 1.872
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.366 vs 24.115
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3013 vs 638
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3310 vs 925
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10372 vs 2240
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3013 vs 638
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3310 vs 925
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10372 vs 2240
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 February 2018 vs 26 October 2017 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2145 vs 1807 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8738 vs 6513 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 853 vs 661 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3173 vs 2341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.311 vs 4.657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 375.23 vs 270.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.018 vs 1.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.366 vs 24.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3013 vs 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3310 vs 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10372 vs 2240 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3013 vs 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3310 vs 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10372 vs 2240 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 14x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.733 vs 6.358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 vs 6.358 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2145 | 1807 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8738 | 6513 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 853 | 661 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3173 | 2341 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2013 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.311 | 4.657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 375.23 | 270.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.018 | 1.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.366 | 24.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.358 | 88.733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3013 | 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3310 | 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10372 | 2240 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3013 | 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3310 | 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10372 | 2240 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen | Zen |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
| Launch date | 12 February 2018 | 26 October 2017 |
| OPN PIB | YD2400C5FBBOX | |
| OPN Tray | YD2400C5M4MFB | YM2500C4T4MFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Place in performance rating | 376 | 1475 |
| Price now | $158.99 | |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.20 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Die size | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm FinFET | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 95°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 11 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 8 |
| Transistor count | 4500 Million | 4500 Million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics max frequency | 1250 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| iGPU core count | 11 | 8 |
| Processor graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM4 | FP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | Not included |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
| Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| Video Core Next (VCN) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen 5 2400G with others
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
IntelCore i3-7101TE
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 7 5700GE
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 7 PRO 5750G
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
IntelCore i3-12300
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 5 7600
AMDRyzen 5 2400G vs
IntelCore i5-13490F
