AMD Ryzen 5 2400G versus AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G et AMD Ryzen 5 2500U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Soutien des graphiques API. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Processeur est ouvert; un multiplicateur ouvert soutien le overclocking plus facile
- Environ 8% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.9 GHz versus 3.6 GHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2145 versus 1807
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 8738 versus 6513
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 853 versus 661
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3173 versus 2341
- 9.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.311 versus 4.657
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 375.23 versus 270.96
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.018 versus 1.872
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.366 versus 24.115
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3013 versus 638
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3310 versus 925
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10372 versus 2240
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3013 versus 638
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3310 versus 925
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10372 versus 2240
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 February 2018 versus 26 October 2017 |
| Ouvert | Ouvert versus barré |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.9 GHz versus 3.6 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2145 versus 1807 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8738 versus 6513 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 853 versus 661 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3173 versus 2341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.311 versus 4.657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 375.23 versus 270.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.018 versus 1.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.366 versus 24.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3013 versus 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3310 versus 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10372 versus 2240 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3013 versus 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3310 versus 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10372 versus 2240 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 14x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.733 versus 6.358
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.733 versus 6.358 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2145 | 1807 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8738 | 6513 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 853 | 661 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3173 | 2341 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2013 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.311 | 4.657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 375.23 | 270.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.018 | 1.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.366 | 24.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.358 | 88.733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3013 | 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3310 | 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10372 | 2240 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3013 | 638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3310 | 925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10372 | 2240 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Zen | Zen |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
| Date de sortie | 12 February 2018 | 26 October 2017 |
| OPN PIB | YD2400C5FBBOX | |
| OPN Tray | YD2400C5M4MFB | YM2500C4T4MFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 1475 |
| Prix maintenant | $158.99 | |
| Série | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.20 | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Fréquence de base | 3.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| Cache L1 | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Cache L3 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm FinFET | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 95°C | 95°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 11 | 8 |
| Nombre de fils | 8 | 8 |
| Compte de transistor | 4500 Million | 4500 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Fréquence mémoire prise en charge | 2933 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphiques |
||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1250 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 11 | 8 |
| Graphiques du processeur | Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | FP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | Not included |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
| Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| Video Core Next (VCN) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
