AMD Ryzen 9 3900 vs AMD A4-6320

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 9 3900 and AMD A4-6320 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 3900

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 10 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 2
• 22 more threads: 24 vs 2
• Around 107400% higher clock speed: 4300 MHz vs 4 GHz
• Around 36% higher maximum core temperature: 95 °C vs 70°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 9 3900
CPU 2: AMD A4-6320

Compare specifications (specs)