AMD Ryzen Embedded V1202B vs AMD A4-6300
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Embedded V1202B and AMD A4-6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1202B
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- 2.7x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1600 vs 1402
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3532 vs 1424
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 871 vs 372
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 871 vs 372
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | February 2018 vs June 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 96 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1600 vs 1402 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3532 vs 1424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 871 vs 372 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 871 vs 372 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A4-6300
- Around 70% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1351 vs 516
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1351 vs 516
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2829 vs 1058
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2829 vs 1058
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1351 vs 516 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1351 vs 516 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2829 vs 1058 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2829 vs 1058 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Embedded V1202B
CPU 2: AMD A4-6300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Ryzen Embedded V1202B | AMD A4-6300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1600 | 1402 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3532 | 1424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 871 | 372 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 871 | 372 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 516 | 1351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 516 | 1351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1058 | 2829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1058 | 2829 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 440 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 696 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.119 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.1 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.647 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.25 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1202B | AMD A4-6300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zen | Richland |
Launch date | February 2018 | June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 2279 | 2293 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
OPN PIB | AD6300OKHLBOX | |
OPN Tray | AD6300OKA23HL | |
Series | AMD A4-Series APU for Desktops | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 210 mm | 246 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 96 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm SOI |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 4950 million | 1178 million |
Base frequency | 3.7 GHz | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 70°C | |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3-1600 |
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Sockets supported | FM2 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Graphics |
||
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 760 MHz | |
iGPU core count | 128 | |
Number of pipelines | 128 | |
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8370D | |
Switchable graphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 2.0 |