AMD Sempron 145 vs Intel Celeron E3400
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 145 and Intel Celeron E3400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 145
- CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1015 vs 1001
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 325 vs 301
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | September 2010 vs January 2010 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1015 vs 1001 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 vs 301 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E3400
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 869 vs 518
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 510 vs 317
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 869 vs 518 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 510 vs 317 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 145
CPU 2: Intel Celeron E3400
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD Sempron 145 | Intel Celeron E3400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1015 | 1001 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 518 | 869 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 | 301 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 317 | 510 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Sempron 145 | Intel Celeron E3400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Sargas | Wolfdale |
Launch date | September 2010 | January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $95 | $76 |
Place in performance rating | 2751 | 2753 |
Price now | $16.98 | $75.47 |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.02 | 5.63 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | E3400 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 117 mm | 82 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 2 |
Transistor count | 234 million | 228 million |
Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |