AMD Sempron 2650 vs AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 2650 and AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 2650
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 7.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 84.309 vs 11.035
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.31 vs 0.192
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.811 vs 3.856
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.309 vs 11.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.31 vs 0.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.811 vs 3.856 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1213 vs 477
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2358 vs 551
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 397 vs 151
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1331 vs 253
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.763 vs 3.724
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1213 vs 477 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2358 vs 551 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 397 vs 151 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1331 vs 253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.763 vs 3.724 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 2650
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Sempron 2650 | AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 477 | 1213 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 551 | 2358 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 151 | 397 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 253 | 1331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.724 | 3.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.309 | 11.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.31 | 0.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.299 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.811 | 3.856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Sempron 2650 | AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Family | AMD Sempron | |
OPN PIB | SD2650JAHMBOX | |
OPN Tray | SD2650JAH23HM | |
Place in performance rating | 2887 | 2867 |
Series | AMD Sempron Dual-Core APU | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture codename | Deneb | |
Launch date | January 2009 | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 1.45 GHz | |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Unlocked | ||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 258 mm | |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | |
Transistor count | 758 million | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 1 | |
Supported memory frequency | 1333 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Graphics |
||
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 400 MHz | |
iGPU core count | 128 | |
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | |
Switchable graphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | AM1 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 125 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |