AMD Sempron 3000+ EE SFF vs AMD Sempron 3200+
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 3000+ EE SFF and AMD Sempron 3200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3000+ EE SFF
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 62 Watt
L2 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 62 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3200+
- Around 13% higher clock speed: 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 3000+ EE SFF
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3200+
Name | AMD Sempron 3000+ EE SFF | AMD Sempron 3200+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 456 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 251 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 875 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 826 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Sempron 3000+ EE SFF | AMD Sempron 3200+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Manila | Manila |
Launch date | May 2006 | May 2006 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 2742 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $13 | |
Price now | $13 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.19 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 103 mm | 103 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 81 million | 81 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 62 Watt |