AMD Sempron 3500+ EE SFF vs AMD Sempron 3600+
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 3500+ EE SFF and AMD Sempron 3600+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3500+ EE SFF
- Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 62 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 62 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3600+
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
L2 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 3500+ EE SFF
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3600+
Name | AMD Sempron 3500+ EE SFF | AMD Sempron 3600+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 377 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 364 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Sempron 3500+ EE SFF | AMD Sempron 3600+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Manila | Manila |
Launch date | May 2006 | May 2006 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 3170 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | |
Price now | $12 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.93 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 103 mm | 103 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 81 million | 81 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 62 Watt |