Intel Atom Z3795 vs Intel Celeron N2940

Comparative analysis of Intel Atom Z3795 and Intel Celeron N2940 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics interfaces, Peripherals, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

Intel Atom Z3795

Intel Celeron N2940

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Atom Z3795

Around 6% higher clock speed: 2.39 GHz vs 2.25 GHz
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 640 vs 607
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1188 vs 1043
Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 217 vs 199
Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 743 vs 632
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.904 vs 1.144
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 8.148 vs 7.897
Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.144 vs 0.116
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.692 vs 1.471

Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency	2.39 GHz vs 2.25 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	640 vs 607
PassMark - CPU mark	1188 vs 1043
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	217 vs 199
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	743 vs 632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.904 vs 1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	8.148 vs 7.897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.144 vs 0.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.692 vs 1.471

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2940

2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1298 vs 875
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1298 vs 875

Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1298 vs 875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1298 vs 875

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Atom Z3795
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N2940

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

640

607

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1188

1043

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

217

199

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

743

632

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

2.904

1.144

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

8.148

7.897

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.144

0.116

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.692

1.471

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

875

1298

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

875

1298

Name	Intel Atom Z3795	Intel Celeron N2940
PassMark - Single thread mark	640	607
PassMark - CPU mark	1188	1043
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	217	199
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	743	632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.904	1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	8.148	7.897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.144	0.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.692	1.471
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	875	1298
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	875	1298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		0.47

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Atom Z3795	Intel Celeron N2940
Essentials
Architecture codename	Bay Trail	Bay Trail
Launch date	Q1'14	22 May 2014
Place in performance rating	3138	3152
Processor Number	Z3795	N2940
Series	Intel® Atom™ Processor Z Series	Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series
Status	Launched	Launched
Vertical segment	Mobile	Mobile
Performance
64 bit support
Base frequency	1.59 GHz	1.83 GHz
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	22 nm
Maximum frequency	2.39 GHz	2.25 GHz
Number of cores	4	4
Number of threads	4	4
L1 cache		224 KB
L2 cache		2 MB
Maximum core temperature		100°C
Memory
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	17.1 GB/s	21.32 GB/s
Maximum memory size	4 GB	8 GB
Supported memory types	LPDDR3 1066	DDR3L 1333
Graphics
Graphics base frequency	311 MHz	313 MHz
Graphics max frequency	778 MHz	854 MHz
Processor graphics	Intel HD Graphics	Intel HD Graphics
Graphics max dynamic frequency		854 MHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Compatibility
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size	17mm x 17mm	25mm x 27mm
Scenario Design Power (SDP)	2 W	4.5 W
Sockets supported	UTFCBGA1380	FCBGA1170
Max number of CPUs in a configuration		1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		7.5 Watt
Advanced Technologies
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Smart Connect
Virtualization
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Graphics interfaces
Number of displays supported		2
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
Peripherals
Max number of PCIe lanes		4
Number of USB ports		5
PCI Express revision		2.0
PCIe configurations		1x4
Total number of SATA ports		2
USB revision		3.0 and 2.0
Security & Reliability
Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Secure Key technology