Intel Atom x5-Z8500 vs Intel Core i3-4025U
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom x5-Z8500 and Intel Core i3-4025U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom x5-Z8500
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 18% higher clock speed: 2.24 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.985 vs 4.049
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 85.204 vs 21.304
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.507 vs 0.175
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.184 vs 1.135
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1685 vs 1114
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1685 vs 1114
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.24 GHz vs 1.9 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.985 vs 4.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 85.204 vs 21.304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.507 vs 0.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.184 vs 1.135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1685 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1685 vs 1114 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-4025U
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1082 vs 630
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1968 vs 1245
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 381 vs 207
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 911 vs 675
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.131 vs 6.893
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 738 vs 500
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2584 vs 1374
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 738 vs 500
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2584 vs 1374
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1082 vs 630 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1968 vs 1245 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 381 vs 207 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 911 vs 675 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.131 vs 6.893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 738 vs 500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2584 vs 1374 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 738 vs 500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2584 vs 1374 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom x5-Z8500
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-4025U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom x5-Z8500 | Intel Core i3-4025U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 630 | 1082 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1245 | 1968 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 207 | 381 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 675 | 911 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.985 | 4.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 85.204 | 21.304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.507 | 0.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.184 | 1.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.893 | 12.131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 500 | 738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1685 | 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1374 | 2584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 500 | 738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1685 | 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1374 | 2584 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom x5-Z8500 | Intel Core i3-4025U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Cherry Trail | Haswell |
| Launch date | Q1'15 | 14 April 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 2465 | 2456 |
| Processor Number | x5-Z8500 | i3-4025U |
| Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $275 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.44 GHz | 1.90 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.24 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3 1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Device ID | 0xA16 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 950 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600 | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 | 3200x2000@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3200x2000@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
| Sockets supported | UTFCBGA1380 | FCBGA1168 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 2 | 10 |
| Number of USB ports | 3 | 4 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 2x1, 1x2 | 4x1, 1x4, 1x2 |
| USB revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Integrated IDE | ||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| PCI support | ||
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel® Active Management technology (AMT) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Matrix Storage | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Atom x5-Z8500 with others
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCore i7-620UM
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCore i5-4300Y
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCeleron 847E
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDA4-9120e
