AMD E2-9000e vs Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Comparative analysis of AMD E2-9000e and Intel Atom x5-Z8500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E2-9000e
- Around 89186% higher clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 2.24 GHz
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1406 vs 1374
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1406 vs 1374
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2000 MHz vs 2.24 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1406 vs 1374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1406 vs 1374 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom x5-Z8500
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 500 vs 319
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 500 vs 319
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1685 vs 647
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1685 vs 647
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 500 vs 319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 500 vs 319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1685 vs 647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1685 vs 647 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E2-9000e
CPU 2: Intel Atom x5-Z8500
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD E2-9000e | Intel Atom x5-Z8500 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 319 | 500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 319 | 500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 647 | 1685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 647 | 1685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1406 | 1374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1406 | 1374 |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 631 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1236 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 207 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 675 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.985 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 85.204 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.893 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD E2-9000e | Intel Atom x5-Z8500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Cherry Trail |
Family | AMD E2-Series for Notebooks | |
Place in performance rating | 2643 | 2456 |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Launch date | Q1'15 | |
Processor Number | x5-Z8500 | |
Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | |
Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1500 MHz | 1.44 GHz |
L1 cache | 160 KB | |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2000 MHz | 2.24 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 1.2 billion | |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 14.9 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Supported memory types | DDR4-1866 | LPDDR3 1600 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 600 MHz | 200 MHz |
Number of pipelines | 128 | |
Processor graphics | Radeon R2 series | |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Execution Units | 12 | |
Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | |
Max video memory | 8 GB | |
Compatibility |
||
Package Size | micro-BGA | 17mm x 17mm |
Sockets supported | BGA (FT4) | UTFCBGA1380 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 2 | |
Number of USB ports | 3 | |
PCIe configurations | 2x1, 1x2 | |
USB revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600 | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Secure Boot |