Intel Atom x5-Z8500 versus Intel Core i3-4025U
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Atom x5-Z8500 et Intel Core i3-4025U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Soutien des graphiques API. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Atom x5-Z8500
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 18% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.24 GHz versus 1.9 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.985 versus 4.049
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 85.204 versus 21.304
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.507 versus 0.175
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.184 versus 1.135
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1685 versus 1114
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1685 versus 1114
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.24 GHz versus 1.9 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.985 versus 4.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 85.204 versus 21.304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.507 versus 0.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.184 versus 1.135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1685 versus 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1685 versus 1114 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i3-4025U
- Environ 11% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 100°C versus 90°C
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1094 versus 631
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1961 versus 1236
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 381 versus 207
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 911 versus 675
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.131 versus 6.893
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 738 versus 500
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2584 versus 1374
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 738 versus 500
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2584 versus 1374
| Caractéristiques | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C versus 90°C |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1094 versus 631 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1961 versus 1236 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 381 versus 207 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 911 versus 675 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.131 versus 6.893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 738 versus 500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2584 versus 1374 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 738 versus 500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2584 versus 1374 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Atom x5-Z8500
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-4025U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Atom x5-Z8500 | Intel Core i3-4025U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 631 | 1094 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1236 | 1961 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 207 | 381 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 675 | 911 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.985 | 4.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 85.204 | 21.304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.507 | 0.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.184 | 1.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.893 | 12.131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 500 | 738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1685 | 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1374 | 2584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 500 | 738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1685 | 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1374 | 2584 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Atom x5-Z8500 | Intel Core i3-4025U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Cherry Trail | Haswell |
| Date de sortie | Q1'15 | 14 April 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2457 | 2447 |
| Processor Number | x5-Z8500 | i3-4025U |
| Série | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $275 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.44 GHz | 1.90 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.24 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB | |
| Cache L3 | 3 MB | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | LPDDR3 1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Unités d’éxécution | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 600 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Device ID | 0xA16 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 950 MHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 2560x1600 | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 | 3200x2000@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3200x2000@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | N / A | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
| Prise courants soutenu | UTFCBGA1380 | FCBGA1168 |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 2 | 10 |
| Nombre des ports USB | 3 | 4 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 2x1, 1x2 | 4x1, 1x4, 1x2 |
| Révision USB | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| IDE integré | ||
| LAN integré | ||
| Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | |
| Soutien de PCI | ||
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | |
| UART | ||
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Technologie Intel® Active Management (AMT) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Matrix Storage | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Atom x5-Z8500 avec des autres
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCore i7-620UM
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCore i5-4300Y
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDA4-9120e
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCeleron 7305
