Intel Atom x7-E3950 vs Intel Celeron N3350
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom x7-E3950 and Intel Celeron N3350 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom x7-E3950
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 110°C vs 105°C
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2071 vs 1108
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 837 vs 530
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 741 vs 446
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1273 vs 1140
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2381 vs 1444
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 741 vs 446
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1273 vs 1140
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2381 vs 1444
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 110°C vs 105°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2071 vs 1108 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 837 vs 530 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 741 vs 446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1273 vs 1140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2381 vs 1444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 741 vs 446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1273 vs 1140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2381 vs 1444 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N3350
- Around 20% higher clock speed: 2.40 GHz vs 2.00 GHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 12 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 800 vs 741
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 290 vs 253
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.40 GHz vs 2.00 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 12 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 800 vs 741 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 290 vs 253 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom x7-E3950
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N3350
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom x7-E3950 | Intel Celeron N3350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 741 | 800 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2071 | 1108 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 253 | 290 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 837 | 530 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 741 | 446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1273 | 1140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2381 | 1444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 741 | 446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1273 | 1140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2381 | 1444 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom x7-E3950 | Intel Celeron N3350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake | Apollo Lake |
| Launch date | Q4'16 | 1 September 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 2221 | 2519 |
| Processor Number | E3950 | N3350 |
| Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Status | Announced | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 110°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.00 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Operating Temperature Range | -40°C to 85°C | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L (ECC and Non ECC) up to 1866MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x5A84 | 0x5A85 |
| Execution Units | 18 | 12 |
| Graphics base frequency | 500 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | Intel® HD Graphics 500 |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160 @60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2160 @ 60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 @30Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | Yes | 12 |
| OpenGL | Yes | 4.3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 24mm x 31mm | 24mm x 31mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1296 | FCBGA1296 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 6 | 6 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | 8 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | x4,x2,x1 | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | 2 |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 40-bit | |
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Atom x7-E3950 with others
IntelAtom x7-E3950 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P7370
IntelAtom x7-E3950 vs
IntelCore i7-3615QM
IntelAtom x7-E3950 vs
AMDE1-6015
IntelAtom x7-E3950 vs
IntelCeleron N4020
