Intel Celeron 1005M vs Intel Core i7-3517U
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1005M and Intel Core i7-3517U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1005M
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.937 vs 0.545
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.453 vs 6.249
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.149 vs 0.076
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.522 vs 1.198
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1949 vs 1737
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1949 vs 1737
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 July 2013 vs 3 June 2012 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.937 vs 0.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.453 vs 6.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.149 vs 0.076 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.522 vs 1.198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1949 vs 1737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1949 vs 1737 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-3517U
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 58% higher clock speed: 3.00 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1349 vs 1017
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2123 vs 1113
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 506 vs 339
- Around 75% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1106 vs 633
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.179 vs 1.277
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.00 GHz vs 1.9 GHz |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB vs 2048 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1349 vs 1017 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2123 vs 1113 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 506 vs 339 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1106 vs 633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.179 vs 1.277 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1005M
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-3517U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 1005M | Intel Core i7-3517U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1017 | 1349 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1113 | 2123 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 339 | 506 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 633 | 1106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.937 | 0.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.453 | 6.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.149 | 0.076 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.522 | 1.198 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.277 | 2.179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1949 | 1737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1949 | 1737 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 1005M | Intel Core i7-3517U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Launch date | 1 July 2013 | 3 June 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2770 | 2782 |
| Processor Number | 1005M | i7-3517U |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.90 GHz | 1.90 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 94 mm | 118 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.9 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 |
| Device ID | 0x166 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) | 31.0mm x 24.0mm |
| Sockets supported | FCPGA988 | FCBGA1023 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron 1005M with others
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore Duo T2700
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SP9400
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore i7-3517U
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
AMDGX-217GA
