Intel Celeron 1005M vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1005M and Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1005M
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1016 vs 929
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1109 vs 863
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 339 vs 335
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 633 vs 584
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 July 2013 vs 20 August 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1016 vs 929 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1109 vs 863 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 339 vs 335 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 633 vs 584 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400
- Around 26% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
- 12x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz |
L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 512 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1005M
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron 1005M | Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1016 | 929 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1109 | 863 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 339 | 335 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 633 | 584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.937 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.453 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.149 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.522 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.277 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1949 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1949 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron 1005M | Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Penryn |
Launch date | 1 July 2013 | 20 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $284 |
Place in performance rating | 2762 | 2768 |
Processor Number | 1005M | SP9400 |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Price now | $284 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.74 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.90 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 1066 MHz FSB |
Die size | 94 mm | 107 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 6134 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105°C |
Maximum frequency | 1.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
Transistor count | 410 million | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
CRT | ||
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
SDVO | ||
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 37.5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) | 22mm x 22mm |
Sockets supported | FCPGA988 | BGA956 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |