Intel Celeron 1005M versus Intel Core i7-3517U
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron 1005M et Intel Core i7-3517U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron 1005M
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.937 versus 0.545
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.453 versus 6.249
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.149 versus 0.076
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.522 versus 1.198
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1949 versus 1737
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1949 versus 1737
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 July 2013 versus 3 June 2012 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.937 versus 0.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.453 versus 6.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.149 versus 0.076 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.522 versus 1.198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1949 versus 1737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1949 versus 1737 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-3517U
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 58% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.00 GHz versus 1.9 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L3, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L3 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 17 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1349 versus 1017
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2123 versus 1113
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 506 versus 339
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1106 versus 633
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.179 versus 1.277
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.00 GHz versus 1.9 GHz |
| Cache L3 | 4096 KB versus 2048 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1349 versus 1017 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2123 versus 1113 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 506 versus 339 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1106 versus 633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.179 versus 1.277 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1005M
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-3517U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron 1005M | Intel Core i7-3517U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1017 | 1349 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1113 | 2123 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 339 | 506 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 633 | 1106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.937 | 0.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.453 | 6.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.149 | 0.076 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.522 | 1.198 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.277 | 2.179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1949 | 1737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1949 | 1737 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron 1005M | Intel Core i7-3517U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | 1 July 2013 | 3 June 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2770 | 2782 |
| Processor Number | 1005M | i7-3517U |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.90 GHz | 1.90 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Taille de dé | 94 mm | 118 mm |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Cache L3 | 2048 KB | 4096 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Fréquence maximale | 1.9 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 |
| Device ID | 0x166 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| SDVO | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) | 31.0mm x 24.0mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCPGA988 | FCBGA1023 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron 1005M avec des autres
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore Duo T2700
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SP9400
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
IntelCore i7-3517U
IntelCeleron 1005M vs
AMDGX-217GA
