Intel Celeron 220 vs AMD Athlon XP 1500+
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 220 and AMD Athlon XP 1500+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 220
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 180 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 255 vs 251
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 209 vs 167
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2007 vs October 2001 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 180 nm |
L2 cache | 512 KB vs 256 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 255 vs 251 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 209 vs 167 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 1500+
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 1.33 GHz vs 1.2 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
Maximum frequency | 1.33 GHz vs 1.2 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 220
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 1500+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron 220 | AMD Athlon XP 1500+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 255 | 251 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 209 | 167 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron 220 | AMD Athlon XP 1500+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Conroe | Palomino |
Launch date | October 2007 | October 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 3267 | 3271 |
Processor Number | 220 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 533 MHz FSB | |
Die size | 77 mm2 | 150 mm |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 533 MHz | |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 180 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
Maximum frequency | 1.2 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Number of threads | 1 | |
Transistor count | 105 million | 63 million |
VID voltage range | 1.0000V-1.3375V | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Sockets supported | PBGA479 | A |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 60 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |