Intel Celeron 220 vs Intel Pentium III 800
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 220 and Intel Pentium III 800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 220
- Around 50% higher clock speed: 1.2 GHz vs 0.8 GHz
- Around 25% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 80°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 180 nm
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 20.8 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 255 vs 237
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 209 vs 182
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.2 GHz vs 0.8 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 80°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 180 nm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB vs 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB vs 256 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 20.8 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 255 vs 237 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 209 vs 182 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 220
CPU 2: Intel Pentium III 800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 220 | Intel Pentium III 800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 255 | 237 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 209 | 182 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 220 | Intel Pentium III 800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Conroe | Coppermine T |
| Launch date | October 2007 | n/d |
| Place in performance rating | 3278 | 3284 |
| Processor Number | 220 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.20 GHz | 800 MHz |
| Bus Speed | 533 MHz FSB | 133 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 77 mm2 | 80 mm |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 533 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 180 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 80°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.2 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Number of threads | 1 | |
| Transistor count | 105 million | 44 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.0000V-1.3375V | 1.75V |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 69 °C | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
| Sockets supported | PBGA479 | PPGA370, SECC2, SECC2495 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 20.8 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
