Intel Celeron D 352 vs AMD Athlon 64 FX-57
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron D 352 and AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron D 352
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 86 Watt vs 104 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 576 vs 552
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | May 2006 vs June 2005 |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt vs 104 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 576 vs 552 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 FX-57
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 517 vs 274
Specifications (specs) | |
L1 cache | 128 KB vs 16 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 517 vs 274 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron D 352
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 FX-57
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron D 352 | AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 576 | 552 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 274 | 517 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron D 352 | AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Cedarmill | San Diego |
Launch date | May 2006 | June 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 2883 | 2914 |
Processor Number | 352 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.20 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 533 MHz FSB | |
Die size | 81 mm2 | 115 mm |
L1 cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 69.2°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 188 million | 114 million |
VID voltage range | 1.25V-1.325V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Sockets supported | PLGA775 | 939 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | 104 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |