Intel Celeron G3900 vs Intel Core i5-4670K
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G3900 and Intel Core i5-4670K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G3900
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Around 65% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 84 Watt
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.745 vs 3.966
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.573 vs 6.563
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | September 2015 vs June 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 32 GB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt vs 84 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.745 vs 3.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.573 vs 6.563 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-4670K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 36% higher clock speed: 3.80 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2145 vs 1690
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 5576 vs 2148
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 974 vs 678
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3181 vs 1244
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 80.679 vs 34.175
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.451 vs 0.264
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.3 vs 1.171
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.80 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) vs 4096 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2145 vs 1690 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5576 vs 2148 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 974 vs 678 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3181 vs 1244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 80.679 vs 34.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.451 vs 0.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.3 vs 1.171 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G3900
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4670K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G3900 | Intel Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1690 | 2145 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2148 | 5576 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 678 | 974 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1244 | 3181 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 2144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.745 | 3.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 34.175 | 80.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.264 | 0.451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.171 | 2.3 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.573 | 6.563 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 861 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1554 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2853 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 861 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1554 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2853 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G3900 | Intel Core i5-4670K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Skylake | Haswell |
| Launch date | September 2015 | June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $50 | $266 |
| Place in performance rating | 2193 | 2195 |
| Price now | $52.62 | $240 |
| Processor Number | G3900 | i5-4670K |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.63 | 9.37 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Die size | 150 mm | 177 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | 6144 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3.80 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 1400 million |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.72°C | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x1902 | 0x412 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 950 MHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 950 MHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| VGA | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | 1920x1200@60Hz |
| Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2013D |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron G3900 with others
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 420e
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelCeleron G440
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDFX-6120
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDA4-5300B
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelCore i5-4670K
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelPentium G3240
