Intel Celeron G3900 vs AMD A4-5300B
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G3900 and AMD A4-5300B processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G3900
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1717 vs 1237
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2186 vs 1230
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 678 vs 403
- 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1244 vs 622
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 861 vs 327
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1554 vs 1142
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2853 vs 2537
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 861 vs 327
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1554 vs 1142
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2853 vs 2537
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | September 2015 vs October 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1717 vs 1237 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2186 vs 1230 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 678 vs 403 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1244 vs 622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 861 vs 327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1554 vs 1142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2853 vs 2537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 861 vs 327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1554 vs 1142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2853 vs 2537 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A4-5300B
- Around 21% higher clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G3900
CPU 2: AMD A4-5300B
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G3900 | AMD A4-5300B |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1717 | 1237 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2186 | 1230 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 678 | 403 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1244 | 622 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.745 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 34.175 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.264 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.171 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.573 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 861 | 327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1554 | 1142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2853 | 2537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 861 | 327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1554 | 1142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2853 | 2537 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G3900 | AMD A4-5300B | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Skylake | Trinity |
| Launch date | September 2015 | October 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $50 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2122 | 2125 |
| Price now | $52.62 | |
| Processor Number | G3900 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.63 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Die size | 150 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 70 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 1178 million |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x1902 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 950 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 950 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
| Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron G3900 with others
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDPhenom X4 9150e
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDFX-6120
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
AMDA4-5300B
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelCore i3-3210
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelCore i5-6600T
IntelCeleron G3900 vs
IntelCore i5-4460T
