Intel Celeron J1800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1800 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

Intel Celeron J1800

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1800

CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 45% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 72.4°C
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.151 vs 0.33

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 November 2013 vs January 2008
Maximum core temperature	105°C vs 72.4°C
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 45 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	1.151 vs 0.33

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Around 16% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.58 GHz
Around 14% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Around 87% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1237 vs 660
2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1201 vs 575
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.099 vs 0.078
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.408 vs 1.007
3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.311 vs 7.14

Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency	3 GHz vs 2.58 GHz
L1 cache	128 KB vs 112 KB
L2 cache	6144 KB vs 1 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	1237 vs 660
PassMark - CPU mark	1201 vs 575
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.099 vs 0.078
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2.408 vs 1.007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	26.311 vs 7.14

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

660

1237

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

575

1201

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.151

0.33

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.078

0.099

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.007

2.408

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

7.14

26.311

Name	Intel Celeron J1800	Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
PassMark - Single thread mark	660	1237
PassMark - CPU mark	575	1201
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	1.151	0.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.078	0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.007	2.408
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1389
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7.14	26.311
Geekbench 4 - Single Core		422
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core		738
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score		2400
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		0.68

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Celeron J1800	Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Essentials
Architecture codename	Bay Trail	Wolfdale
Launch date	1 November 2013	January 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$72
Place in performance rating	3025	3020
Processor Number	J1800	E8400
Series	Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status	Launched	Discontinued
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
Price now		$129.95
Value for money (0-100)		4.87
Performance
64 bit support
Base frequency	2.41 GHz	3.00 GHz
L1 cache	112 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	6144 KB
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	45 nm
Maximum core temperature	105°C	72.4°C
Maximum frequency	2.58 GHz	3 GHz
Number of cores	2	2
Number of threads	2
Bus Speed		1333 MHz FSB
Die size		107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)		72 °C
Transistor count		410 million
VID voltage range		0.8500V-1.3625V
Memory
Max memory channels	2
Maximum memory size	8 GB
Supported memory types	DDR3L 1333	DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Graphics
Graphics base frequency	688 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	792 MHz
Graphics max frequency	792 MHz
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics	Intel HD Graphics
Graphics interfaces
Number of displays supported	2
Compatibility
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Package Size	25mm X 27mm	37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported	FCBGA1170	LGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	65 Watt
Peripherals
Max number of PCIe lanes	4
PCI Express revision	2.0
PCIe configurations	X4, X2, X1
Security & Reliability
Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Advanced Technologies
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST)
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Physical Address Extensions (PAE)	36-bit
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Thermal Monitoring
Virtualization
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)