Intel Celeron J1800 vs AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1800 and AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1800
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 80 Watt
Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs January 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 24% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.58 GHz
- 2.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1307 vs 658
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1296 vs 573
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.25 vs 1.151
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.13 vs 0.078
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.308 vs 1.007
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 9.709 vs 7.14
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.58 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 112 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1307 vs 658 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1296 vs 573 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.25 vs 1.151 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.13 vs 0.078 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.308 vs 1.007 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.709 vs 7.14 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1800
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron J1800 | AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 658 | 1307 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 573 | 1296 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.151 | 2.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.078 | 0.13 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.007 | 2.308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1389 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1389 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.14 | 9.709 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 411 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 762 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.213 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron J1800 | AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Callisto |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $72 | |
Place in performance rating | 3030 | 3035 |
Processor Number | J1800 | |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | |
Status | Launched | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.41 GHz | |
L1 cache | 112 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
Maximum frequency | 2.58 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Die size | 258 mm | |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Transistor count | 758 million | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 688 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 792 MHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 792 MHz | |
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm X 27mm | |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 80 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |