Intel Celeron J1800 vs AMD Phenom X4 9650
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1800 and AMD Phenom X4 9650 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1800
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 2.58 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 65 nm
- 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.151 vs 0.833
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs March 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.58 GHz vs 2.3 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.151 vs 0.833 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9650
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4.6x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 910 vs 655
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1743 vs 570
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 8.403 vs 7.14
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 910 vs 655 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1743 vs 570 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.403 vs 7.14 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1800
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9650
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron J1800 | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 655 | 910 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 570 | 1743 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.151 | 0.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.078 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.007 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1389 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1389 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.14 | 8.403 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 283 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 990 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron J1800 | AMD Phenom X4 9650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Agena |
| Launch date | 1 November 2013 | March 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $72 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3041 | 3047 |
| Processor Number | J1800 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.41 GHz | |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.58 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
| Die size | 285 mm | |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
| Transistor count | 450 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 688 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 792 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 792 MHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm X 27mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | AM2+ |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 95 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||