Intel Celeron J1800 vs AMD Phenom X4 9650

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1800 and AMD Phenom X4 9650 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1800

  • CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher clock speed: 2.58 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 65 nm
  • 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 95 Watt
  • Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.151 vs 0.833
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 November 2013 vs March 2008
Maximum frequency 2.58 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.151 vs 0.833

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9650

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 4.6x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 38% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 908 vs 658
  • 3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1733 vs 573
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 8.403 vs 7.14
Specifications (specs)
Number of cores 4 vs 2
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 112 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) vs 1 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 908 vs 658
PassMark - CPU mark 1733 vs 573
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 8.403 vs 7.14

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1800
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9650

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
658
908
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
573
1733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.151
0.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
7.14
8.403
Name Intel Celeron J1800 AMD Phenom X4 9650
PassMark - Single thread mark 658 908
PassMark - CPU mark 573 1733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.151 0.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.078
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.007
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1389
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7.14 8.403
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 283
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 990

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Celeron J1800 AMD Phenom X4 9650

Essentials

Architecture codename Bay Trail Agena
Launch date 1 November 2013 March 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $72
Place in performance rating 3031 3038
Processor Number J1800
Series Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series
Status Launched
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 2.41 GHz
L1 cache 112 KB 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 1 MB 512 KB (per core)
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 65 nm
Maximum core temperature 105°C
Maximum frequency 2.58 GHz 2.3 GHz
Number of cores 2 4
Number of threads 2
Die size 285 mm
L3 cache 2048 KB (shared)
Transistor count 450 million

Memory

Max memory channels 2
Maximum memory size 8 GB
Supported memory types DDR3L 1333

Graphics

Graphics base frequency 688 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 792 MHz
Graphics max frequency 792 MHz
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics Intel HD Graphics

Graphics interfaces

Number of displays supported 2

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 25mm X 27mm
Sockets supported FCBGA1170 AM2+
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 95 Watt

Peripherals

Max number of PCIe lanes 4
PCI Express revision 2.0
PCIe configurations X4, X2, X1

Security & Reliability

Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST)
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) 36-bit

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)