Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Core i5-3470
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1900 and Intel Core i5-3470 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1900
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 67.4°C
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 77 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.336 vs 9.637
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs 8 April 2012 |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 67.4°C |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1024 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 77 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.336 vs 9.637 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-3470
- Around 49% higher clock speed: 3.60 GHz vs 2.42 GHz
- Around 14% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 3x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1937 vs 652
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4671 vs 1151
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 734 vs 210
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2396 vs 686
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.217 vs 3.068
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.393 vs 0.139
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.821 vs 0.508
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.424 vs 1.753
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1515 vs 1007
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1515 vs 1007
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 3.60 GHz vs 2.42 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 224 KB |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1937 vs 652 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 4671 vs 1151 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 734 vs 210 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2396 vs 686 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.217 vs 3.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.393 vs 0.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.821 vs 0.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.424 vs 1.753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1515 vs 1007 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1515 vs 1007 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1900
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3470
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 652 | 1937 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1151 | 4671 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 210 | 734 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 | 2396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.068 | 3.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.336 | 9.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 | 0.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.508 | 1.821 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.753 | 5.424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1007 | 1515 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1007 | 1515 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2696 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Core i5-3470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Ivy Bridge |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | 8 April 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $82 | $184 |
Place in performance rating | 3166 | 2409 |
Processor Number | J1900 | i5-3470 |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $112.06 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.60 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
L1 cache | 224 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 67.4°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.42 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
Die size | 132.8 mm | |
L3 cache | 6144 KB | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 32 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 688 MHz | 650 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 854 MHz | 1.10 GHz |
Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | 1.1 GHz |
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
Device ID | 0x152 | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm X 27mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | FCLGA1155 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 77 Watt |
Thermal Solution | 2011D | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | |
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |