Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Pentium G630
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1900 and Intel Pentium G630 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1900
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 52% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 69.1°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 75% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.068 vs 1.017
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.139 vs 0.136
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs September 2011 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 69.1°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| L1 cache | 224 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.068 vs 1.017 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 vs 0.136 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G630
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 2.7 GHz vs 2.42 GHz
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1252 vs 652
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1352 vs 1151
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 469 vs 210
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 843 vs 686
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 25.45 vs 11.336
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.698 vs 0.508
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.872 vs 1.753
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz vs 2.42 GHz |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1252 vs 652 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1352 vs 1151 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 469 vs 210 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 843 vs 686 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 25.45 vs 11.336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.698 vs 0.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.872 vs 1.753 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1900
CPU 2: Intel Pentium G630
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Pentium G630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 652 | 1252 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1151 | 1352 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 210 | 469 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 | 843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.068 | 1.017 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.336 | 25.45 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 | 0.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.508 | 0.698 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.753 | 1.872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1007 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1007 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Pentium G630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Sandy Bridge |
| Launch date | 1 November 2013 | September 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $82 | $100 |
| Place in performance rating | 3166 | 2992 |
| Processor Number | J1900 | G630 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $24.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.96 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 69.1°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.42 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Die size | 131 mm | |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | |
| Transistor count | 504 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3 1066 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 688 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 854 MHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm X 27mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 65 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron J1900 with others
IntelCeleron J1900 vs
AMDAthlon XP 2600+
IntelCeleron J1900 vs
AMDSempron 3100+
IntelCeleron J1900 vs
AMDSempron 3600+
IntelCeleron J1900 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E6750
IntelCeleron J1900 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E7200
IntelCeleron J1900 vs
IntelAtom D410
