Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher maximum core temperature: 74.1°C vs 62.2°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 62% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 105 Watt
| Launch date | August 2008 vs April 2007 |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C vs 62.2°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2.7x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1074 vs 1056
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2096 vs 952
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 353 vs 342
- Around 95% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1114 vs 571
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.576 vs 0.291
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.478 vs 13.015
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.148 vs 0.083
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB vs 3072 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1074 vs 1056 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2096 vs 952 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 353 vs 342 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1114 vs 571 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.576 vs 0.291 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.478 vs 13.015 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.148 vs 0.083 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1056 | 1074 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 952 | 2096 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 342 | 353 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 571 | 1114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.291 | 0.576 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.015 | 24.478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.083 | 0.148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.829 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.217 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Kentsfield |
| Launch date | August 2008 | April 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 3061 | 3062 |
| Price now | $19.99 | $44.99 |
| Processor Number | E7300 | Q6700 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.46 | 21.53 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 286 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB | 8192 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 62 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | 62.2°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 228 million | 582 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.500V |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 105 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
