Intel Core 2 Duo E8190 vs AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E8190 and AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8190
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Launch date | January 2008 vs December 2007 |
Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz vs 2.3 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E8190
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo E8190 | AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.554 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.083 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo E8190 | AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Agena |
Launch date | January 2008 | December 2007 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 3318 |
Processor Number | E8190 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 285 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 6144 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 72.4°C | |
Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 450 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | AM2+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |