Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E6750

Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

  • CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
  • Around 1% higher maximum core temperature: 72.4°C vs 72°C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1234 vs 1030
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1210 vs 1024
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 422 vs 358
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 738 vs 628
  • Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.33 vs 0.193
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.311 vs 21.122
  • Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.099 vs 0.068
  • Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.68 vs 0.419
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.408 vs 2.133
Specifications (specs)
Launch date January 2008 vs July 2007
Maximum frequency 3 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
Maximum core temperature 72.4°C vs 72°C
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 65 nm
L1 cache 128 KB vs 64 KB
L2 cache 6144 KB vs 4096 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1234 vs 1030
PassMark - CPU mark 1210 vs 1024
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 422 vs 358
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 738 vs 628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.33 vs 0.193
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 26.311 vs 21.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.099 vs 0.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.68 vs 0.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.408 vs 2.133

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E6750

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1234
1030
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1210
1024
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
422
358
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
738
628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.33
0.193
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
26.311
21.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.099
0.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.68
0.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
2.408
2.133
Name Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
PassMark - Single thread mark 1234 1030
PassMark - CPU mark 1210 1024
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 422 358
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 738 628
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 2400
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.33 0.193
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 26.311 21.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.099 0.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.68 0.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.408 2.133

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Intel Core 2 Duo E6750

Essentials

Architecture codename Wolfdale Conroe
Launch date January 2008 July 2007
Place in performance rating 2981 3172
Price now $129.95 $12.95
Processor Number E8400 E6750
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 4.87 38.98
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 3.00 GHz 2.66 GHz
Bus Speed 1333 MHz FSB 1333 MHz FSB
Die size 107 mm2 143 mm2
L1 cache 128 KB 64 KB
L2 cache 6144 KB 4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 65 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C
Maximum core temperature 72.4°C 72°C
Maximum frequency 3 GHz 2.67 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Transistor count 410 million 291 million
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.3625V 0.8500V-1.5V

Memory

Supported memory types DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported LGA775 PLGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 65 Watt

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)