Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
- Around 1% higher maximum core temperature: 72.4°C vs 72°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1234 vs 1030
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1210 vs 1024
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 422 vs 358
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 738 vs 628
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.33 vs 0.193
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.311 vs 21.122
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.099 vs 0.068
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.68 vs 0.419
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.408 vs 2.133
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | January 2008 vs July 2007 |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.67 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 72.4°C vs 72°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 4096 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1234 vs 1030 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1210 vs 1024 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 422 vs 358 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 738 vs 628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.33 vs 0.193 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.311 vs 21.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.099 vs 0.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.68 vs 0.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.408 vs 2.133 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 | Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1234 | 1030 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1210 | 1024 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 422 | 358 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 738 | 628 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2400 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.33 | 0.193 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.311 | 21.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.099 | 0.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.68 | 0.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.408 | 2.133 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 | Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Conroe |
Launch date | January 2008 | July 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 2981 | 3172 |
Price now | $129.95 | $12.95 |
Processor Number | E8400 | E6750 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.87 | 38.98 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 6144 KB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 72.4°C | 72°C |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.5V |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | PLGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |