Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8600
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher clock speed: 3.33 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 27.856 vs 24.255
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | August 2008 vs July 2007 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.33 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 27.856 vs 24.255 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.522 vs 0.368
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.138 vs 0.109
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.829 vs 2.67
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.748 vs 0.7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB vs 6144 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.522 vs 0.368 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 vs 0.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.829 vs 2.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.748 vs 0.7 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E8600
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1383 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1360 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 468 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 798 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.368 | 0.522 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 27.856 | 24.255 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.109 | 0.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.67 | 3.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.7 | 0.748 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Kentsfield |
| Launch date | August 2008 | July 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 2960 | 3306 |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Processor Number | E8600 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.21 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.33 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 2x 143 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | 8192 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 62 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.4°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.33 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 582 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | 775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
