AMD Phenom II X4 925 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8600

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 925 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

AMD Phenom II X4 925

Intel Core 2 Duo E8600

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 925

CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
Around 67% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2277 vs 1360
Around 44% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1147 vs 798
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.088 vs 0.368
Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.197 vs 0.109
Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.231 vs 2.67

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	May 2009 vs August 2008
Number of cores	4 vs 2
L1 cache	128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark	2277 vs 1360
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1147 vs 798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	1.088 vs 0.368
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.197 vs 0.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	3.231 vs 2.67

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8600

Around 19% higher clock speed: 3.33 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Around 20% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1383 vs 1150
Around 31% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 468 vs 357
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 27.856 vs 10.457

Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency	3.33 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
L2 cache	6144 KB vs 512 KB (per core)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	1383 vs 1150
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	468 vs 357
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	27.856 vs 10.457

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 925
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8600

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1150

1383

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

2277

1360

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

357

468

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

1147

798

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.088

0.368

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

10.457

27.856

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.197

0.109

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

3.231

2.67

Name	AMD Phenom II X4 925	Intel Core 2 Duo E8600
PassMark - Single thread mark	1150	1383
PassMark - CPU mark	2277	1360
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	357	468
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1147	798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	1.088	0.368
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	10.457	27.856
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.197	0.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	3.231	2.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		0.7

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Phenom II X4 925	Intel Core 2 Duo E8600
Essentials
Architecture codename	Deneb	Wolfdale
Launch date	May 2009	August 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$160
Place in performance rating	2976	2960
Price now	$43.99	$49.99
Value for money (0-100)	22.90	14.21
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
Processor Number		E8600
Series		Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status		Discontinued
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	258 mm	107 mm2
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	64 KB
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	6144 KB
L3 cache	6144 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology	45 nm	45 nm
Maximum frequency	2.8 GHz	3.33 GHz
Number of cores	4	2
Transistor count	758 million	410 million
Base frequency		3.33 GHz
Bus Speed		1333 MHz FSB
Maximum case temperature (TCase)		72 °C
Maximum core temperature		72.4°C
VID voltage range		0.8500V-1.3625V
Memory
Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Compatibility
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Sockets supported	AM3	LGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size		37.5mm x 37.5mm
Security & Reliability
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Advanced Technologies
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring
Virtualization
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)