Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 7% higher clock speed: 2.13 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 837 vs 762
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 783 vs 678
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 278 vs 266
  • Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 473 vs 441
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.231 vs 0.218
  • Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.362 vs 0.317
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.679 vs 1.613
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 January 2009 vs 9 May 2007
Maximum frequency 2.13 GHz vs 2 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 837 vs 762
PassMark - CPU mark 783 vs 678
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 278 vs 266
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 473 vs 441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.231 vs 0.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.362 vs 0.317
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.679 vs 1.613

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

  • Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
  • Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.996 vs 13.657
  • Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.073 vs 0.066
Specifications (specs)
Maximum core temperature 100°C vs 90°C
L2 cache 4096 KB vs 3072 KB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 15.996 vs 13.657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.073 vs 0.066

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
837
762
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
783
678
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
278
266
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
473
441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.231
0.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
13.657
15.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.066
0.073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.362
0.317
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.679
1.613
Name Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
PassMark - Single thread mark 837 762
PassMark - CPU mark 783 678
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 278 266
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 473 441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.231 0.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 13.657 15.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.066 0.073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.362 0.317
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.679 1.613

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

Essentials

Architecture codename Penryn Merom
Launch date 1 January 2009 9 May 2007
Place in performance rating 3241 3248
Price now $39.99 $30.99
Processor Number P7450 T7300
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 10.44 11.33
Vertical segment Mobile Mobile
Launch price (MSRP) $234

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 2.13 GHz 2.00 GHz
Bus Speed 1066 MHz FSB 800 MHz FSB
Die size 107 mm2 143 mm2
Front-side bus (FSB) 1066 MHz 800 MHz
L2 cache 3072 KB 4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 65 nm
Maximum core temperature 90°C 100°C
Maximum frequency 2.13 GHz 2 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 2
Transistor count 410 million 291 million
VID voltage range 1.050V-1.150V
L1 cache 64 KB

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Sockets supported PGA478 PPGA478, PBGA479
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1
Package Size 35mm x 35mm

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Idle States

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 with others

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 Intel
Core 2 Duo P7450
vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 Intel
Core 2 Duo T7300
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 Intel
Core 2 Duo P7450
vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 Intel
Core 2 Duo P7350
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 Intel
Core 2 Duo P7450
vs Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 Intel
Core 2 Duo SL9400