Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 2.13 GHz vs 2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 840 vs 760
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 788 vs 676
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 278 vs 266
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 473 vs 441
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.231 vs 0.218
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.362 vs 0.317
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.679 vs 1.613
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 January 2009 vs 9 May 2007 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.13 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 840 vs 760 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 788 vs 676 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 278 vs 266 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 473 vs 441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.231 vs 0.218 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.362 vs 0.317 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.679 vs 1.613 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.996 vs 13.657
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.073 vs 0.066
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 3072 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.996 vs 13.657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.073 vs 0.066 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 840 | 760 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 788 | 676 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 278 | 266 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 473 | 441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.231 | 0.218 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.657 | 15.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.066 | 0.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.362 | 0.317 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.679 | 1.613 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
| Launch date | 1 January 2009 | 9 May 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 3152 | 3166 |
| Price now | $39.99 | $30.99 |
| Processor Number | P7450 | T7300 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.44 | 11.33 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $234 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.13 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.150V | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Sockets supported | PGA478 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo P7450 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T7300
IntelCore 2 Duo P7450 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P7350
IntelCore 2 Duo P7450 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SL9400
