Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 2.26 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 920 vs 863
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 849 vs 828
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 517 vs 507
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.446 vs 0.264
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 July 2008 vs 8 May 2007 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.26 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 920 vs 863 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 849 vs 828 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 302 vs 301 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 517 vs 507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.446 vs 0.264 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.235 vs 0.23
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.316 vs 13.234
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.072 vs 0.049
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.59 vs 1.273
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 3072 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.235 vs 0.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.316 vs 13.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.072 vs 0.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.59 vs 1.273 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 920 | 863 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 849 | 828 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 302 | 301 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 517 | 507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.23 | 0.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.234 | 15.316 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.049 | 0.072 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.446 | 0.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.273 | 1.59 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
| Launch date | 15 July 2008 | 8 May 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | $234 |
| Place in performance rating | 3212 | 3220 |
| Price now | $297.01 | $42.99 |
| Processor Number | P8400 | T7500 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.44 | 8.72 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.150V | 1.075V - 1.250V |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35 mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | PGA478, BGA479 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo P8400 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T7500
IntelCore 2 Duo P8400 vs
IntelPentium Dual Core T4500
IntelCore 2 Duo P8400 vs
IntelCeleron M U3400
