Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 and Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 2.26 GHz
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.058 vs 0.049
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.639 vs 1.273
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 January 2009 vs 15 July 2008 |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz vs 2.26 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.058 vs 0.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.639 vs 1.273 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 920 vs 904
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 849 vs 824
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 302 vs 272
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 517 vs 474
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.23 vs 0.226
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 13.234 vs 7.743
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.446 vs 0.387
Specifications (specs) | |
L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 1024 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 920 vs 904 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 849 vs 824 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 302 vs 272 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 517 vs 474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.23 vs 0.226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.234 vs 7.743 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.446 vs 0.387 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 904 | 920 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 824 | 849 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 272 | 302 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 474 | 517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.226 | 0.23 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.743 | 13.234 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.058 | 0.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.387 | 0.446 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.639 | 1.273 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
Launch date | 10 January 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 3227 | 3212 |
Processor Number | T4500 | P8400 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | |
Price now | $297.01 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.44 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.30 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 1066 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 3072 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.150V | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Sockets supported | PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Package Size | 35 mm x 35mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |